New Politics
New Politics: Australian Politics
Seat Warmers: What Is Labor Actually For?
0:00
-1:05:14

Seat Warmers: What Is Labor Actually For?

The final week of parliament ends with a whimper, with so many issues still left up in the air; what is the point of the Labor government? And the stupid tricks from the burqa wearing Pauline Hanson.

In this final week of Parliament, we ask some uncomfortable questions about Australian federal politics, the Albanese Labor government, and what passes for reform in Canberra today. With a much-anticipated Liberal leadership challenge against Sussan Ley failing to materialise, attention turns to what is – and isn’t – happening on Labor’s watch. While the opposition remains fractured and increasingly irrelevant, the government itself appears hesitant, managerial, and deeply cautious at a time when bold decisions are needed. From stalled gambling advertising reform and tensions with the Australian Greens, to looming job cuts across the public service and at the CSIRO, this episode examines the gap between Labor’s election promises and its actions in office.

We look at the government’s call for so-called “efficiency drives” in the federal public service, the political optics of cutting scientific and research capacity, and the growing sense that Labor is echoing policies it once campaigned against. With inflation rising again to around 3.8 per cent, productivity falling, and Australia’s economy showing long-term structural weaknesses, the discussion moves beyond day-to-day politics to the deeper causes of Australia’s economic malaise. Weak business investment, decades of policy favouring speculation over innovation, and revenue choices stretching back to the Howard era are all placed under the microscope, alongside the case for taxing mining superprofits instead of cutting public services.

We also explore the contradictions at the heart of Labor’s environmental positioning. Despite green rhetoric, net zero language, and last-minute deal-making with the Greens, Australia remains committed to expanding gas and coal projects while championing the interests of the mining and resources sector. With COP31 heading overseas and domestic environmental reform dragging on for years, we ask whether Labor risks paying a similar political price to the Coalition for being perceived as anti-environment – or whether voters simply have nowhere else to go.

Energy policy, gas export contracts, and the enduring legacy of John Howard again come into focus, as former minister Ed Husic raises serious questions about deals that continue to push up gas prices and fuel inflation. The failure to prioritise domestic gas reservation, already proven in Western Australia, speaks volumes about whose interests are really being served in national energy policy.

At its core, this episode asks a bigger question: what is the purpose of a Labor government that seems content to manage inherited systems rather than reform them? From the failed Voice referendum and the troubled National Anti-Corruption Commission to stalled housing reform and lingering HECS debt, the record so far suggests tinkering rather than transformation. Drawing comparisons with Whitlam, Hawke and even Howard, we examine how real reform agendas are declared early – and what it means when a government with a favourable Senate chooses not to act.

Finally, we turn to the political theatre of the right, including Pauline Hanson’s latest burqa stunt in the Senate, the rise of One Nation in the polls, and the growing battle for reactionary votes between minor parties and a hollowed-out Liberal Party. In an environment increasingly defined by provocation, stunts and nihilism, we cut through the noise to ask where Australian politics is heading – and whether competence without courage is enough.

Share

Discussion about this episode

User's avatar

Ready for more?